Incident
From Plastic Tub
| Revision as of 03:14, 20 Apr 2005 Payne (Talk | contribs) category; format ← Go to previous diff |
Revision as of 03:34, 2 May 2005 Undule (Talk | contribs) Go to next diff → |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| - | "The Incident differs from other material phenomena only through an involvement with perception and in this light can be studied under the mantle of etiology; the [[eye]] plays the part of an infecting agent of Mind, infusing the whole with meaning. The Incident, then, is defined by it's relation to a viewer, who acts both as intrepreter and associational instigator. As further explanation, we may relax into the vernacular: if a tree falls in the forest and nobody is there to witness it, did it fall? The question moves from pure materialism to one of teleological concern, arguably the territory of cognition. Further, if a tree falls in the forest and nobody sees it, ''does it matter?'' Theorists of the Incident suggest not; natural activity occuring outside perception is of little, if any, concern." | + | "The Incident differs from other material phenomena only through an involvement with perception and in this light can be studied under the mantle of etiology; the [[eye]] plays the part of an infecting agent of Mind, infusing the whole with meaning. The Incident, then, is defined by it's relation to a viewer, who acts both as intrepreter and associational instigator. As further explanation, we may relax into the vernacular: if a tree falls in the forest and nobody is there to witness it, did it fall? The question moves from pure materialism to one of teleological concern, arguably the territory of cognition. Further, if a tree falls in the forest and nobody sees it, ''does it matter?'' Theorists of the Incident suggest ''not''; natural activity occuring outside perception is of little, if any, concern." |
| == Non-Canonical Text == | == Non-Canonical Text == | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| + | *[[Autotelic|autotelic]] | ||
| *[[Incidentalist]] | *[[Incidentalist]] | ||
Revision as of 03:34, 2 May 2005
Incident pop. 1. Something contingent on or related to something else. 2. An occurrence or event that interrupts normal procedure or precipitates a crisis. 3. Falling upon or striking a surface.
Extrapolation
"The Incident differs from other material phenomena only through an involvement with perception and in this light can be studied under the mantle of etiology; the eye plays the part of an infecting agent of Mind, infusing the whole with meaning. The Incident, then, is defined by it's relation to a viewer, who acts both as intrepreter and associational instigator. As further explanation, we may relax into the vernacular: if a tree falls in the forest and nobody is there to witness it, did it fall? The question moves from pure materialism to one of teleological concern, arguably the territory of cognition. Further, if a tree falls in the forest and nobody sees it, does it matter? Theorists of the Incident suggest not; natural activity occuring outside perception is of little, if any, concern."
Non-Canonical Text
Meat sometimes appears on the horizon -- a hundred years apart!
