Talk:Pig
From Plastic Tub
(Difference between revisions)
Revision as of 12:54, 8 Apr 2005 Payne (Talk | contribs) corrected formatting: nested numbered lists ← Go to previous diff |
Current revision Sven (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | Dave, I wouldnt'suggest using a template in this case, just copy the table code and change the text where appropriate. | ||
+ | |||
to do: | to do: | ||
- | #link to more BBQ festivals | + | #excise the polygnostic truth and render common [[vapor]]. |
- | #"beef up" story behind AA totem | + | |
- | #less flippant remarks about the Eleusinian Mysteries? | + | |
- | #*I second this notion. | + | |
- | #tie into story of Carcassonne saved by tossed pig (see [[Newton Farnell Jameston]]). part of trifecta ([[Triskelion]]) of ancient European trickster war strategies? | + | |
- | #*tossed pig, | + | |
- | #*trojan horse, | + | |
- | #*wolf in sheep's clothing | + | |
- | # excise the polygnostic truth and render common [[vapor]]. | + | |
##Inki Do | ##Inki Do | ||
##Inki Don't | ##Inki Don't | ||
+ | #make fun facts funnier | ||
- | (t)Weird formatting shit going on here, worries me. | + | #adjust layout (wait for updated fun facts text) |
- | + | :*I second this one. This layout is much too "busy" | |
- | (t again) shit, this is odd. gonna have to use div tags? anyhoo, the ''fun facts'' genre, that's a good thing. | + | ;*May I trounce about the shorter pages and add said appropriatted table code? |
- | + | ##Will participants help with imagery till i get me some Photoshop? | |
- | tim - my bad on the weird formatting: i misunderstood how to set up nested numbering lists. excellent job with the ''fun facts'' template! - dp | + | ###I do enjoy Paynes' Extrapolations, and in tandem with Adkins' Useages, apochrypha and general teleo-ness, I can not but help to tempt fate and request your assistance and flank me through ''the dangerous short pages made greAAt.'' |
+ | ###*hey sven - whadda think of this zodiac deal? seems like a good way to pick a group of entries that we could tackle as you suggested above. - payne | ||
+ | ###*exactamundo- I think the zodiak should be 13 signs. each must be a wholly fleshed out archtype/totem of the AA. |
Current revision
Dave, I wouldnt'suggest using a template in this case, just copy the table code and change the text where appropriate.
to do:
- excise the polygnostic truth and render common vapor.
- Inki Do
- Inki Don't
- make fun facts funnier
- adjust layout (wait for updated fun facts text)
- I second this one. This layout is much too "busy"
- May I trounce about the shorter pages and add said appropriatted table code?
- Will participants help with imagery till i get me some Photoshop?
- I do enjoy Paynes' Extrapolations, and in tandem with Adkins' Useages, apochrypha and general teleo-ness, I can not but help to tempt fate and request your assistance and flank me through the dangerous short pages made greAAt.
- hey sven - whadda think of this zodiac deal? seems like a good way to pick a group of entries that we could tackle as you suggested above. - payne
- exactamundo- I think the zodiak should be 13 signs. each must be a wholly fleshed out archtype/totem of the AA.
- I do enjoy Paynes' Extrapolations, and in tandem with Adkins' Useages, apochrypha and general teleo-ness, I can not but help to tempt fate and request your assistance and flank me through the dangerous short pages made greAAt.
- Will participants help with imagery till i get me some Photoshop?